Support

Support Options

  • Knowledge Base

    Find information on common questions and issues.

  • Support Messages

    Check on the status of your correspondences with members of the QUBES team.

Contact Us

About you
About the problem

Documenting teaching scholarship among undergraduate biology educators using OER

By Ahrash Bissell1, Lauren Collister2, Sam S Donovan2, Drew LaMar3, Hayley Orndorf2

1. The Monterey Institute for Technology and Education 2. University of Pittsburgh 3. College of William and Mary

Poster on the use, adaptation, and reuse of Open Educational Resources within the QUBES community at OpenEd 2018

Listed in Teaching Materials | resource by group QUBES Leadership Team

Download Bundle

We're sorry! Resource content is currently unavailable.

Version 1.0 - published on 13 Aug 2018 doi:10.25334/Q4070R - cite this Last public release: 2.0

Licensed under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International according to these terms

opened final.png

Description

The Quantitative Undergraduate Biology Education and Synthesis (QUBES; qubeshub.org) project is designed to support faculty improving biology students’ quantitative skills. Our primary strategy to this end involves engaging faculty in professional development and teaching activities that build their identities as teaching scholars. An important component of building a scholarly identity involves the production, public sharing, and documentation of educational materials. We have adopted an open publishing framework for capturing diverse examples of faculty scholarship and launched a series of online mentoring communities that support faculty participation. Our platform is a git-like system for managing OER creation within the HubZero scientific gateway infrastructure. It features version tracking, automated attribution for derivative works, license selection, DOI assignment, a suite of communication and collaboration tools around engagement with published materials (e.g., following, commenting, collecting), and tracking of metrics around their use (e.g., comments, views, downloads, forks). 

Though few of the technical features in our system are novel, we believe that we have established an important use-case that demonstrates the potential for connecting professional development to participation in the full OER life cycle. Furthermore, we are in the process of collecting data about the use of OER publishing as an important component of documenting scholarly activities for use in evaluation, tenure, and promotion for faculty from diverse institution types. We have had more than 350 submissions representing many different authors. The QUBES teaching-resource collection includes several adaptations that reflect customization for different student audiences, use in different teaching contexts, data localization, and reworking for use with different analysis tools. We still face challenges communicating the goals, norms, and ethos of Open Educational Practices to undergraduate-biology faculty. We also face social and technical difficulties interfacing with existing education projects and sharing resources from other collections. Nonetheless, by situating OER practices within a strong professional network, where existing expectations and mechanisms of trust are already well established, we are seeing that many of the traditional impediments to the realization of a fully fledged OER life-cycle are either not present or relatively easy to overcome. We believe that other communities of practice with an interest in collaborative professional-development activities can learn from the QUBES example and easily adapt our approach to their needs. 

Contents

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags

QUBES Leadership Team

QUBES Leadership Team group image

When watching a resource, you will be notified when a new version is released.