Map your Hazards! large interdisciplinary class implementation - The post-mortem
Last Thursday was the last day of the implementation. The biggest lesson I learned is that large group projects in a class the size of mine (n=82) have lots of free riders. I heard complaints from half a dozen people about the free riding.... So, I decided to build on Hannah's suggestion from our latest call on assessment, and I told the students that their grade for the module would be individual and based on their answers to the questions below. As you see, some of the questions are assessment-oriented (and I suspect I will get a lot of venting), the first relates the module to a common theme for the class, and the second focuses on things they should have learned if they were paying attention to the in-class activities in the first two weeks.
My main conclusion at this point is that the module is viable for a large class if I make smaller groups or if I grade on the basis of individual assignments.
- In which sense are floodplains examples of the tragedy of the commons?
- If you were responsible for assessing vulnerability to a natural hazard, how would you go about doing that?
- What are the pros and cons of using student-led group activities in large classes?
- Which part(s) of the module did you like best? Why?
- Which part(s) of the module did you like least? Why?