Resource Image

Building an Inclusive Botany - Structuring in Class Discussions

Author(s): Makenzie Mabry1, Nuala Caomhanach2, Richard Abrahams3, Shelly Gaynor1, Kasey Khanh Pham1, Tanisha Williams4, Kate Murphy5, Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis1, Douglas Soltis1, Pamela Soltis1

1. University of Florida 2. American Museum of Natural History 3. Yale University 4. Bucknell University 5. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

536 total view(s), 265 download(s)

0 comment(s) (Post a comment)

Summary:
Driven by the national conversation on systemic racism, ongoing inequities, appeals to decolonize science, and the many recent calls for diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion, we use stories of plants to discuss the history of bias and…

more

Driven by the national conversation on systemic racism, ongoing inequities, appeals to decolonize science, and the many recent calls for diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion, we use stories of plants to discuss the history of bias and exclusionary practices in scientific botany, particularly regarding access to scientific spaces, and the exploitation of marginalized peoples. We discuss the many opportunities and challenges presented by the age of information technology as we seek to create a more inclusive botany that recognizes and acknowledges the contributions of historically marginalized groups, including Black and Indigenous communities. We hope this article can be used as a conversation starter to raise awareness, encourage reflection, and promote action toward creating a more equitable and just scientific practice.

Description

In this open education resource (OER) module you will find 1) an instructor guide with suggested class setup options, 2) a PowerPoint presentation that highlights and reviews the main figure from the text, and 3) possible discussion questions that can be adapted for different needs. The manuscript itself can be viewed as a preprint on EcoEvoRxiv and is linked here. 

Notes

First version uploaded

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows: