Master Reference List for STEM Writing Project

Adler-Kassner, L., Barnhouse, S., Eodice, M., Estrem, M., Irvin, L., Kelly-Riley, D., Mitchler, S., Palmquist, M., 2015. CCCC Principles and Standards for the Teaching of Writing [WWW Document]. URL https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/postsecondarywriting (accessed 7.13.21).

Anderman, E.M., 2011. The Teaching and Learning of Twenty-First Century Skills. Presented at the National Research Council Board on Testing and Assessment’s Workshop on Assessment of 21st Century Skills, Irvine, CA, p. 31.

Anson, C.M., 2000. Talking about writing: A classroom-based study of students’ reflections on their drafts., in: Smith, J.B., Yancey, K.B. (Eds.), Self-Assessment and Development in Writing: A Collaborative Inquiry, Written Language Series. Hampton Press, Cresskill, N.J, pp. 59–74.

Artemeva, N., Logie, S., 2003. The Teaching and Practice of Peer Feedback in the Professional Communication Classroom. Language & Learning Across the Disciplines 6, 62–87.

Bahls, P., 2012. Student writing in the quantitative disciplines: a guide for college faculty, 1st ed. ed, The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Baldwin, J. A., Ebert‐May, D., & Burns, D. J. 1999. The development of a college biology self‐efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83(4) 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4%3C397::AID-SCE1%3E3.0.CO;2-%23

Balfour, S. P. 2013. Assessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer Review. Research & Practice in Assessment. 8:40-48. https://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF4.pdf

Bane, S., 2017. Best Practices for Teaching Writing in STEM: A Literature Survey and Case Study of San José  State University’s 100W Courses in STEM Disciplines (Faculty-in-Residence Report). San José State University Writing Center, San José, CA.

Bauerle, C.M., American Association for the Advancement of Science, National Science Foundation (U.S.), Division of Undergraduate Education, National Science Foundation (U.S.), Directorate for Biological Sciences (Eds.), 2011. Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action : final report of a national conference. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

Bazerman, C., 1994. Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions, in: Freedman, A., Medway, P. (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric, Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. Taylor & Francis, London ; Bristol, PA, pp. 79–101.

Bazerman, C., 1984. Modern Evolution of the Experimental Report in Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Soc Stud Sci 14, 163–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014002001

Bazerman, C., Herrington, A., 2006. Circles of Interest: the Growth of Research Communities in WAC and WID/WIP, in: McLeod, S.H., Soven, M. (Eds.), Composing a Community: A History of Writing across the Curriculum, Lauer Series in Rhetoric and Composition. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, Ind, pp. 49–66.

Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774

Björnsson, C.H., 1983. Readability of Newspapers in 11 Languages. Reading Research Quarterly 18, 480–497. https://doi.org/10.2307/747382

Bormuth, J.R., 1969. Development of Readability Analyses. Department of Health, Education, & Welfare, University of Chicago.

Bormuth, J.R., 1966. Readability: A New Approach. Reading Research Quarterly 1, 79–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/747021

Branchaw, J.L., Pape-Lindstrom, P.A., Tanner, K.D., Bissonnette, S.A., Cary, T.L., Couch, B.A., Crowe, A.J., Knight, J.K., Semsar, K., Smith, J.I., Smith, M.K., Summers, M.M., Wienhold, C.J., Wright, C.D., Brownell, S.E., 2020. Resources for Teaching and Assessing the Vision and Change Biology Core Concepts. Life Sciences Education 19, es1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0243

Bredtmann, J., Crede, C. J., & Otten, S. 2013. Methods for evaluating educational programs: does Writing Center participation affect student achievement? Evaluation and Program Planning, 36(1):115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.09.003

Breidenbach, C., 2006. Practical Guidelines for Writers and Teachers, in: Revision: History, Theory, and Practice. pp. 197–219.

Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (2013a). The New Academic Word List. http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org

Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (2013b). The New General Service List. http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org

Carpenter, J.H.C.H., 2001. It’s about the Science: Students Writing and Thinking about Data in a Scientific Writing Course. Language & Learning Across the Disciplines 5, 2.

Center for History and New Media, n.d. Zotero Quick Start Guide [WWW Document]. URL http://zotero.org/support/quick_start_guide

Clughen, L., Connell, M., 2011. Writing and resistance: Reflections on the practice of embedding writing in the curriculum. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211429543

Coil, D., Wenderoth, M.P., Cunningham, M., Dirks, C., 2010. Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005

Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 283–284.

Council of Science Editors (Ed.), 2014. Scientific style and format: the CSE manual for authors, editors, and publishers, Eighth edition. ed. Council of Science Editors ; London : in cooperation with The University of Chicago Press, Chicago : Chicago.

Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project. 2011. Framework for success in postsecondary writing. https://wpacouncil.org/aws/CWPA/pt/sd/news_article/242845/_PARENT/layout_details/false

Dasgupta, A.P., Anderson, T.R., Pelaez, N., 2014. Development and Validation of a Rubric for Diagnosing Students’ Experimental Design Knowledge and Difficulties. CBE Life Science Education, 13, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-09-0192

Davies, M. (2016). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/

Day, R.A., Day, N., 2011. Scientific English: a guide for scientists and other professionals, 3rd ed. ed. Greenwood, Santa Barbara, Calif.

Deane, T., Nomme, K., Jeffery, E., Pollock, C., Birol, G., 2014. Development of the Biological Experimental Design Concept Inventory (BEDCI). CBE Life Science Education 13, 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-11-0218

Eliott, V., 2018. Thinking About the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis. The Qualitative Report 23, 2850–2861.

Farr, J. N., Jenkins, J. J., & Paterson, D. G. (1951). Simplification of Flesch Reading Ease Formula. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062427

Fellows, N.J., 1994. A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31, 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310911

Flesch, R., 1979. How to Write Plain English: A Book for Lawyers and Consumers. Harper & Row.

Flesch, R., 1948. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532

Frechtling, J., Westat. L.S. 1997. User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf97153

Freedman, A., Medway, P. (Eds.), 1994. Genre and the new rhetoric, Critical perspectives on literacy and education. Taylor & Francis, London ; Bristol, PA.

Fry, C.L., 2014. Achieving Systemic Change: A Sourcebook for Advancing and Funding Undergraduate STEM Education. Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, D.C.

Fulwiler, T. 1988. Evaluating Writing Across the Curriculum Programs. In: S. H. McLeod (ed.). Strengthening Programs for Writing Across the Curriculum: New Directions for Teaching and Learning , no. 36. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp. 61-75.

Gass G., Chen L. 2013. Excel based graphical tools for comparing grades across multiple lab or tutorial sections. Tested Studies in Laboratory Teaching, Proceedings of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education, 34:310-313.

Gleason, B. 2000. Evaluating Writing Programs in Real Time: The Politics of Remediation. College Composition and Communication. 51:560. doi: 10.2307/358912.

Gorzelsky, G., Driscoll, D.L., Paszek, J., Jones, E., Hayes, C., 2017. Cultivating constructive metacognition: A new taxonomy for writing studies., in: Moore, J.L., Anson, C.M. (Eds.), Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer, Perspectives on Writing. The WAC Clearinghouse ; University Press of Colorado, Fort Collins, Colorado : Boulder, Colorado, pp. 217–250.

Gottschalk, K.K., 2003. The ecology of response to student essays. ADE Bulletin 134–135, 49–56.

Gottschalk, K.K., Hjortshoj, K., 2004. The elements of teaching writing: a resource for instructors in all disciplines. Bedford/St. Martin’s, Boston.

Graves, H., 2011. Rhetoric, Knowledge, and “The Brute Facts of Nature” in Science Research, in: Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., Artemeva, N., Horne, M., Yousoubova, L. (Eds.), Writing in Knowledge Societies. WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press, pp. 179–192. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2011.2379.2.09

Guilford, WH. 2001. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 25(3)167–175.

Gunning, R., 1968. The Technique of Clear Writing, Revised Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Ha, M., and R. H. Nehm. 2016. Predicting the Accuracy of Computer Scoring of Text: Probabilistic, Multi-Model, and Semantic Similarity Approaches. Presentation at NARST Meeting, Baltimore, MD.

Hall, E., Hughes, B., 2011. Preparing Faculty, Professionalizing Fellows: Keys to Success with Undergraduate Writing Fellows in WAC. The WAC Journal 22, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.37514/WAC-J.2011.22.1.03

Hall, M. 2018. What is Specifications Grading and Why Should You Consider Using It? The Innovative Instructor Blog. https://ii.library.jhu.edu/2018/04/11/what-is-specifications-grading-and-why-should-you-consider-using-it/ (accessed 11/4/2020)

Harris, M., 1979. The overgraded paper: Another case of more is less., in: Stanford, G., National Council of Teachers of English (Eds.), How to Handle the Paper Load, Classroom Practices in Teaching English: 1979-1980. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill, pp. 91–94.

Haswell, R.H., 2006a. Automatons and automated scoring: Drudges, black boxes, and dei ex machina., in: Ericsson, P.F., Haswell, R.H. (Eds.), Machine Scoring of Student Essays: Truth and Consequences. Utah State University Press, Logan, pp. 57–78.

Haswell, R.H., 2006b. The Complexities of Responding to Student Writing; or, Looking for Shortcuts via the Road of Excess. Across the Disciplines 3, 23.

Haswell, R.H., 2005. Automated Text-checkers: A Chronology and a Bibliography of Commentary. Computers and Composition Online Fall, 53.

Henderson, C., Dancy, M.H., 2007. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102

Herdan, G. (1960). Type Token Mathematics. A Textbook of Mathematical Linguistics. (Vol. 4). Mouton & Co.

Holyoak, A.R., 1998. A Plan for Writing Throughout (Not Just Across) the Biology Curriculum. American Biology Teacher 60, 186–190.

Hubbard, K.E., Dunbar, S.D., 2017. Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage. PLOS ONE 12, e0189753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189753

Jackson, N.C., Olinger, A.R., 2021. Chapter 13. Preparing Graduate Students and Contingent Faculty for Online Writing Instruction: A Responsive and Strategic Approach to Designing Professional Development Opportunities, in: Borgman, J., McArdle, C. (Eds.), PARS in Practice: More Resources and Strategies for Online Writing Instructors. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado, pp. 225–242. https://doi.org/10.37514/PRA-B.2021.1145.2.13

Kaplan, J. J., K. C. Haudek, M. Ha, N. Rogness, and D. G. Fisher. 2014. Using Lexical Analysis Software to Assess Student Writing in Statistics. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education 8. 10.5070/T581020235.

Keys, C.W., Hand, B., Prain, V., Collins, S., 1999. Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I

Kiefer, K., Neufeld, J., 2002. Making the Most of Response: Reconciling Coaching and Evaluating Roles for Teachers across the Curriculum. Academic Writing 3.

Kincaid, J.P., Aagard, J.A., O’Hara, J.W., 1980. Development and Test of a Computer Readability Editing System (CRES). US Naval Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, Orlando.

Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L., Chissom, B.S., 1975. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel, Research Branch Report 8-75. Defense Technical Information Center, Millington, Tennessee.

Lang, S., 2018. Evolution of Instructor Response? Analysis of Five Years of Feedback to Students. The Journal of Writing Analytics 2, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.37514/JWA-J.2018.2.1.02

Libarkin, J., Ording, G., 2012. The utility of writing assignments in undergraduate bioscience. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0058

Martella, R.C., Waldron-Soler, K.M. 2005. Language for Writing Program Evaluation. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5(1):81-96.

Matthews, J.R., Matthews, R.W., 2014. Successful scientific writing: a step-by-step guide for the biological and medical sciences, Fourth edition. ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

McCannon, B.C., 2018. Readability and Research Impact. SSRN Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3341573

McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.

McLeod, S.H. 1992. Evaluating Writing Programs: Paradigms, Problems, Possibilities. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12(2), 373–382. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20865864

Moskovitz, C., Kellogg, D., 2005. Primary Science Communication in the First-Year Writing Course. College Composition and Communication 57, 307–334.

Nilson, LB. 2014. Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students and Saving Faculty Time. Stylus Publishing. 184pp. https://styluspub.presswarehouse.com/browse/book/9781620362426/Specifications-Grading

NSF/Dept. Education. 2013. Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13126/nsf13126.pdf

O’Hayre, J. (1966). Gobbledygook Has Gotta Go (p. 113). Bureau of Land Management. http://training.fws.gov/history/HistoricDocuments.html

Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1178

Olson, S., Riordan, D.G., Executive Office of the President, 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President, Executive Office of the President. Executive Office of the President.

Page, E.B., Paulus, D.H., 1968. The analysis of essays by computer. (US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of Research). University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Perelman, L., 2013. Critique (Ver. 3.4) of Mark D. Shermis and Ben Hammer, Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis. Journal of Writing Assessment 6, Article 69.

Perelman, L., 2009. Data driven change is easy: Assessing and maintaining it is the hard part. Across the Disciplines. 6:11.

Plavén-Sigray, P., Matheson, G.J., Schiffler, B.C., Thompson, W.H., 2017. The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time. Elife 6, e27725. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27725

Powers, R. D., Sumner, W. A., & Kearl, B. E. (1958). A recalculation of four adult readability formulas. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043254

Quitadamo, I.J., Kurtz, M.J., 2007. Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203

Reiff, M.J., Bawarshi, A., 2011. Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition. Written Communication 28, 312–337.

Reynolds, J., Smith, R., Moskovitz, C., Sayle, A., 2009. BioTAP: A Systematic Approach to Teaching Scientific Writing and Evaluating Undergraduate Theses. BioScience 59, 896–903.

Reynolds, J.A., Thaiss, C., Katkin, W., Thompson, R.J.J., 2012. Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: a community-based, conceptually driven approach. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064

Reynolds, T., 2001. Training Basic Writing Teachers: Institutional Considerations. Journal of Basic Writing 20, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2001.20.2.05

Rounsaville, A., Goldberg, R., Bawarshi, A., 2008. From Incomes to Outcomes: FYW Students’ Prior Genre Knowledge, Meta-Cognition, and the Question of Transfer. WPA: Writing Program Administration 32, 97–112.

Ruegg, R., 2015. Differences in the Uptake of Peer and Teacher Feedback. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research 46, 131–145.

Saldaña, J., , 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications. 339pp.

Schussler, E.E., Read, Q., Marbach-Ad, G., Miller, K., Ferzli, M., 2015. Preparing Biology Graduate Teaching Assistants for Their Roles as Instructors: An Assessment of Institutional Approaches. CBE Life Sci Educ 14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0196

Scranton, M.A., 1970. SMOG Grading: A Readability Formula by G. Harry McLaughlin. Kansas State University.

Seals DR, and Tanaka H. 2000. Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees.  Adv. Physiol. Educ. 22(1)52-58.

Shanks, R. A., Robertson, C. L., Haygood, C. S., Herdliksa, A. M., Herdliska, H. R., & Lloyd, S. A. 2017. Measuring and Advancing Experimental Design Ability in an Introductory Course without Altering Existing Lab Curriculum. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(1): 18.1.2. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1194

Shermis, M. D., J. Burstein, D. Higgins, and K. Zechner. 2010. Automated Essay Scoring: Writing Assessment and Instruction. Automated Essay Scoring: Writing Assessment and Instruction 4: 20–26.

Silge, J., Robinson, D. 2017. Text Mining with R. O'Reilly Media, Inc. 194pp. https://www.tidytextmining.com/

Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163(4148), 688–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Sirum, K., Humburg, J. 2011. The Experimental Design Ability Test (EDAT). Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 37(1): 8-16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ943887

Smith, E.A., Senter, R.J., 1967. Automated Readability Index. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton OH.

Smith, E. A., & Kincaid, J. P. (1970). Derivation and Validation of the Automated Readability Index for Use with Technical Materials. In Human Factors (Vol. 12, Issue 5, pp. 457–564). https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/001872087001200505

Starke-Meyerring, D. (Ed.), 2011. Writing in knowledge societies, Perspectives on writing. WAC Clearinghouse ; Parlor Press, Fort Collins, Colo. : Anderson, S.C.

Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., 2011. The roles of writing in knowledge societies: Questions, exigencies, and implications for the study and teaching of writing., in: Writing in Knowledge Societies. pp. 3–28.

Supiano, B. 2022. The Unintended Consequences of ‘Ungrading’: Does getting rid of grades make things worse for disadvantaged students? Chronicle of Higher Education, April 29, 2022. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-unintended-consequences-of-ungrading

Swilky, J., 1991. Cross-Curricular Writing Instruction: Can Writing Instructors Resist Institutional Resistance? Case study, 14pp. ERIC ID# ED331066.

Szymanski, E.A., 2014. Instructor feedback in upper-division biology courses: Moving from spelling and syntax to scientific discourse. Across the Disciplines, 11(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2014.11.2.11.

Tanner, K., Allen, D., 2006. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: on integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Sci Educ 5, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-12-0132

Trupiano, C., 2006. Best classroom practices., in: Horning, A.S., Becker, A. (Eds.), Revision: History, Theory, and Practice, Reference Guides to Rhetoric and Composition. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, Ind, pp. 177–197.

Tucker, K., 2018. The Cuttlefish Problem: Readability and “Science-ese” in Scientific Writing. Science Editor 41, 12–13.

Tweedie, F. J., & Baayen, R. H. (1998). How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective. Computers and the Humanities, 32(5), 323–352.

Underwood, J.S., Tregidgo, A.P., 2006. Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations. Journal of Teaching Writing 22, 73–97.

Urban-Lurain, M., M. M. Cooper, K. C. Haudek, J. J. Kaplan, J. K. Knight, and P. P. Lemons. 2015. Expanding a National Network for Automated Analysis of Constructed Response Assessments to Reveal Student Thinking in STEM. Computers in Education Journal 6: 65–81.

Weston, M., K. C. Haudek, L. Prevost, M. Urban-Lurain, and J. Merrill. 2015. Examining the Impact of Question Surface Features on Students’ Answers to Constructed-Response Questions on Photosynthesis. CBE Life Sciences Education 14. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-07-0110.

White, B., Frederiksen, J., Collins, A., 2009. The interplay of scientific inquiry and metacognition., in: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education, The Educational Psychology Series. Routledge, New York, pp. 175–205.

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T., Miller, E., Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. JOSS 4, 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

Wolcott, W. 1996. Evaluating a Basic Writing Program. Journal of Basic Writing, 15(1): 57-69. DOI: 10.37514/JBW-J.1996.15.1.05

Yule, G. U. (1968). The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=-R09AAAAIAAJ

Zhang, P., Huang, X., Wang, Y.,  Jiang, C., He, S. and Wang, H. 2021. Semantic Similarity Computing Model Based on Multi Model Fine-Grained Nonlinear Fusion. IEEE Access. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049378.