Support

Support Options

  • Knowledge Base

    Find information on common questions and issues.

  • Support Messages

    Check on the status of your correspondences with members of the QUBES team.

Contact Us

About you
About the problem

Characterizing the Quantitative Biology Curricula from Institutions Across the United States

By Wendy Jo Levenson1, Monika Norea Herbst1, Sam S Donovan1, Alison N Hale1

1. University of Pittsburgh

Download (PDF)

Licensed according to this deed.

Published on

Abstract

This resource has been updated - find the current version here: https://qubeshub.org/publications/236

Due to the increasingly quantitative nature of the biological sciences, many schools now offer majors in mathematical biology. As this is a new major, there is no standard for how the program should be designed nor is there a place to easily access information about each school’s curriculum. In this study we analyzed the curriculum of ten mathematical biology programs to characterize their core components and their interdisciplinary nature. We then compared these programs to elucidate similarities and differences in: the percentage of credit hours devoted to mathematics vs. science; the department in which the major is housed; the number of required courses at different levels of learning (introductory, intermediate, and advanced); the number of undergraduate students enrolled in the major; and the number of interdisciplinary courses offered. Preliminary analyses indicate that programs vary across a wide spectrum in the percentage of credit hours devoted to mathematics vs. science. The programs that are heavily skewed towards either math or science lack courses that are cross-listed between departments. However, most programs offer courses with titles that suggest a blend of mathematical and biology concepts. We also found that most mathematical biology programs are housed in the mathematics department. By characterizing the layout, focus, and difficulty of mathematical biology programs, professionals in this field will be able to compare their curriculum with others to create a more consistent curriculum.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Wendy Jo Levenson; Monika Norea Herbst; Sam S Donovan; Alison N Hale (2015), "Characterizing the Quantitative Biology Curricula from Institutions Across the United States," https://qubeshub.org/resources/352.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags