Bright Idea, or Bad Idea?
One of the ongoing challenges of teaching scientific writing is getting students out of the habit of writing a Methods section that is a list of steps they followed. This is not how most primary literature is written, but they keep doing it. Has anyone tried writing a more general protocol guide or handbook for their courses, then had students reference the protocols just like they would primary literature articles? If so, how did it go? If not, anyone have thoughts?
Part of the inspiration for this idea is the old "red books," big binders full of protocols that most molecular biology labs subscribed to in the pre-internet days. There are open-access journals that follow this model (J. of Visualized Experiments, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, etc.) Why not use the methods write-up to do more?